The good folks at Canadian Lawyer asked me to write an op-ed about the debate over two-for-one sentencing credits, giving an overview of the arguments. The result is here.
« What Is It With Globe and Mail Op-Ed Writers... | Main | Polygamy Panjandrum »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c006253ef01156ffa935a970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Not to Argue in Favour of 2-for-1 (Seis):
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Great piece, good balanced view of the issue and the debate.
Posted by: Dave Mitchell | April 09, 2009 at 12:10 AM